Entries Tagged as ''

Congress to Consider Mandatory Paid Sick Leave

According to an article published by The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) on May 15, 2009, Senator Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts and Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut will be reintroducing the Healthy Families Act in both houses of Congress this week. The legislation, if passed, will require all employers with fifteen or more employees to offer a minimum of seven paid sick days per year for workers to use to care for their own or a family member’s medical needs.

According to the article, the legislation is being supported by three different advocacy groups: The National Partnership for Women and Families; The Fairness Initiative on Low-Wage Workers; and The National Association of Working Women. The same legislation was proposed, but failed, in the 2007 Congress. Similar legislation has been passed on the local level in San Francisco, Milwaukee, and Washington D.C. It is also being proposed in Philadelphia and New York City.

In an effort to relieve the burden on employers of tracking local, state and federal requirements, SHRM is recommending alternative federal legislation that would encourage – but not require – employers to offer paid sick leave in return for an exemption from complying with other local, state, or federal legislation on the issue. Currently, the federal Family Medical Leave Act requires employers with fifty or more employees at a given worksite to offer their employees up to twelve weeks of unpaid medical leave annually. For more information, you can visit SHRM’s website at www.shrm.org or contact us directly.

Dirk A. Beamer

Things to Keep in Mind Regarding Charitable Donations

If you or your business makes donations, you should keep the following points in mind. First, you can easily evaluate an organization prior to donating since tax-exempt organizations must make their application for exemption and their tax returns available for public inspection. You may request documents in writing, and the organization has 30 days to respond. Second, if privacy is important to you, know that donor lists are not public information unless the organization is a private foundation or a political organization.

Additionally, use caution in making donations, as not all exempt organizations are eligible to receive tax-deductible charitable donations. To determine eligibility, contact the charity directly or look online at IRS.gov for the Internal Revenue Service Publication 78 and the “Search for Charities” page. If organizations are seeking contributions that are not tax-deductible, the organizations must disclose that fact.

If you suspect improper activities from a tax-exempt organization, you may file a complaint with the Exempt Organizations Examination Division by completing Form 13909 (“Tax-Exempt Organization Complaint (Referral) Form”), located online at IRS.gov.

Dirk A. Beamer
————————————-

BE PREPARED FOR SWINE FLU ISSUES

While the nation and the world struggle to discern the severity of the current swine flu outbreak, employers across the globe must prepare for how a potential flu outbreak might impact their workplace. Take steps now to avoid the worst.

First, employers should gain a basic understanding of the illness and potential problems. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has a lengthy, excellent guidance directing employers how to respond to pandemics in the workplace. You should review this guidance for very helpful information. It can be downloaded from here: OSHA3327pandemic.pdf.

Second, employers should use common sense. Any employees returning from travel to Mexico City in particular should be encouraged to stay away from the workplace for three days. (The flu has an incubation period of 2 to 3 days.) Having an employee work from home is a small price to pay to avoid a potential outbreak in the workplace. Similarly, employers should encourage all employees to be proactive in responding to potential symptoms and to removing themselves from the workplace.

Without resorting to panic, employers would be wise to prepare for the worst. They should consider short-term options for telecommuting their employees, and they should also be proactive in making sure that critical vendors and suppliers are not at risk for shutdown if the flu becomes an epidemic. Finally, basic workplace hygiene, safety, and travel polices should all be reviewed with reminders provided to employees about basic steps that can be taken to mitigate the risk of a flu outbreak in the workplace.

To download a copy of the OSHA 3327 guidelines please click on this link OSHA3327pandemic.pdf

Dirk A. Beamer

Buying “Distressed” Property; Remember the Basics

First thing this past Monday morning I opened my email and read a request from a friend, asking that I help a friend of hers with a real estate purchase. The closing was scheduled for early that same Monday afternoon. While last minute requests like this are not unusual, what was unusual here was that the purchase agreement for this transaction was signed the preceding Sunday evening, within the past 12 hours!

I contacted the friend-of-my-friend (I’ll call him “Fred” for the sake of convenience) who told me that he lived in an apartment, saw this home while walking through a nearby neighborhood on Sunday afternoon, and, figuring that it might be time for him to consider home ownership, he called the phone number on the sign. Within hours he met with the real estate agent for the seller, went through the home and signed a purchase agreement which provided for a closing the next afternoon. He had never bought or sold a home before and just figured that this was the way these things were done; after all, that’s what the seller’s real estate agent told him. And, like all of us, he has heard the ads exclaiming the unbelievable bargains that can be had in real estate these days.

The purchase agreement that he faxed to me, although identified as a “Standard Form Purchase Agreement” was unlike anything I have seen in my many years of practice. Once the double spacing was eliminated, it amounted to a half-page of text. There were three companies identified in the form, but their exact role and involvement in the transaction was not specified. There were no addresses or contact information for any of them. The price was specified, as was the fact that it was to be paid in cash at the closing which was set for the next afternoon. Fred would not receive a title insurance commitment before the closing but might receive title insurance at the closing through some unidentified company (this provision was really fuzzy.) Fred had no right to conduct a structural inspection of the property and title would be transferred by means of a quit claim deed.

We then spent the morning researching the companies identified in the purchase agreement and finding out what we could about the property. Insofar as the companies were concerned, we found a maze of interconnected companies and individuals, with the particular “seller” and real estate agent in this transaction legally formed and licensed just within the past few months. The property, we learned, was a foreclosed home that had been sold to the selling company about the same time that the selling company was formed, just a few months ago. The selling company did have a rudimentary website which listed a number of properties that it was offering for sale to “investors” for cash, pursuant to quit claim deeds.

I ultimately told Fred that based upon the research we were able to do in the few hours available to us, this deal had, at worst, all the markings of a scam. At best, this transaction was not for him. Fred was looking for a home, his home; he is not a sophisticated real estate investor who could afford to lose his investment as a cost of doing business, with the prospect of bigger returns elsewhere.

I’m finding that there are a lot of “Fred’s” out there who have the money and desire to get into homes of their own. Internet, radio and print ads would have us believe that the deals are incredible and the risks minimal or nonexistent. Buying foreclosed or “distressed” properties presents substantial issues that transcend a “typical” real estate transaction. In fact, the first thing I tell clients who are considering buying these types of properties is to forget everything they know about buying real estate. While a detailed explanation of those issues is beyond the scope of this article, I thought that a reminder of some of the basics might be in order.

1. Inspection. The opportunity to conduct, or, to have a professional of your choosing conduct (at your expense) a physical inspection of the property is absolutely essential, as is the right to terminate the purchase agreement if, in your discretion, you don’t like what the inspection reveals. Here in Michigan we are coming off one of the coldest winters in memory. In most foreclosed homes, the utilities have been shut off. That means no gas, no electricity and no heat-none. As a result, roofs have leaked over the winter, causing structural damage and mold. Much of the damage is hidden from view, intentionally covered up cosmetically, or, the buyer just doesn’t know what to look for. A physical inspection is a must.

2. Title Insurance Issued by a Reputable Provider. Like everyone else, the downturn in the economy has adversely affected title insurance companies. I don’t have the exact figures at my finger tips but I seem to recall reading that as a result of the recent failures of title insurance companies, as well as acquisitions and mergers involving title companies, that there are only a few nationally based companies that continue to handle the nation’s title insurance needs. Title insurance agencies, on the other hand, seem to be springing up on every street corner (the agency identified in Fred’s purchase agreement was one I had never heard and one for which I could find no information whatsoever.) Title insurance does a lot of things, most important of which is protecting the buyer. For a fee (the title insurance premium) the title company will research the condition of title and insure that the buyer is actually getting “good title” to the property (subject to any specified exceptions or exclusions in the policy.) Although this can all get pretty complicated, what every buyer needs to remember is that they need title insurance, provided by a reputable company, through a reputable agency, and that they need to see the commitment before the closing. They also need the right to terminate the transaction if they don’t like what they see in the commitment.

3. Deeds. Deeds conveying ownership of real property come in many forms and are identified by many names. Here in Michigan deeds basically fall into two categories; quit claim deeds and warranty deeds. A quit claim deed says “whatever ownership interest I have in this property, I am hereby selling to you.” That ownership interest could be all encompassing, or none at all. For example, I could legally sell the Brooklyn Bridge pursuant to a quit claim deed. Admittedly, this example is simplistic and ignores a lot of ancillary issues (such as fraud), but, the analogy works; that is, irrespective of the fact that I have no ownership interest in the Brooklyn Bridge, I have not acted illegally if I find someone who is willing to pay me for it and receive nothing more than a quit claim deed in return.

Warranty deeds are different. The seller of real property by means of a warranty deed is representing that he or she (or it) owns the property, has the right to sell the property and will defend the title against anyone who claims that they have an ownership interest in the property. Admittedly, and, particularly in the case of a foreclosed home being purchased from the foreclosing lender, it may not be possible to get a warranty deed for any number of reasons. In these situations, title insurance becomes even more important, likewise the form and language of the deed being offered by the lender. But, Fred, was not buying his home from a foreclosing lender. By agreeing to accept nothing more than a quit claim deed, he could have ended up paying his money and getting nothing in return. Or, nothing but a whole lot of problems.

So, how did this all turn out for Fred? Well, he was able to stop payment on his sizeable deposit check and, citing some provisions of Michigan law, we were able to legally declare the purchase agreement terminated and avoid the closing. Fred was happy that the seller and real estate agent “agreed” to this. On the other hand, we became even more convinced that this was a scam, that seller knew he had been caught and was happy to let this one go, knowing that there are many more “Fred’s” out there.

Duane L. Reynolds

§1031 Exchanges Defer Treatment of Capital Gains, but the IRS will not “Save” a Transaction if the Qualified Intermediary files for Bankruptcy or Otherwise Neglects to Complete the Transaction within Strict IRS Time Frames.

§1031 Exchanges Defer Treatment of Capital Gains, but the IRS will not “Save” a Transaction if the Qualified Intermediary files for Bankruptcy or Otherwise Neglects to Complete the Transaction within Strict IRS Time Frames.

For all that is said and written about taxes, it really boils down to the following;
(1.) when you earn a dollar, you pay income tax (federal, state, local, and so on);
(2.) when you spend that dollar, you pay sales tax;
(3.) if you invest that dollar and you receive a dividend or interest, you pay taxes on the dividends and interest;
(4.) if you invest that dollar and it grows, you pay capital gains taxes when you sell the investment; and
(5.) if you die with that dollar, you pay federal estate taxes (more accurately, and, to be fair to the IRS, if you die with a lot of dollars, and haven’t done any estate planning, you pay federal estate taxes.)
Concerning point number (4.), the Internal Revenue Code allows for the deferral of the recognition of gain (and with it, the payment of capital gains taxes) on the sale of appreciated real estate through something known as a “1031 Exchange.”

The Internal Revenue Code §1031 tax deferred treatment of capital gains is one of the best means for preserving and building real estate holdings. The property owner is essentially transferring the financial gain that is realized from the sale of a property to another like-kind property without the recognition of federal capital gains tax at the time of the sale IF the rules in §1031 are closely followed, including the rules that replacement property must be identified in 45 days and the transaction closed in 180 days. If you simply sell your property, accept the proceeds, and reinvest the money in another property, the transaction will not qualify for 1031 exchange treatment, even if the transactions close simultaneously.

The property owner must completely avoid receipt of money or other property during the transaction. If you receive the earnest money deposit or the entire cash proceeds from the exchange of your property, you will not qualify for §1031 exchange treatment. This is not easy to avoid. You must overcome the doctrine of constructive receipt. The general rules concerning actual and constructive receipt apply to determine if you are in actual or constructive receipt of money or other property before you actually receive like-kind Replacement Property.

A reputable, financially stable Qualified Intermediary can provide the vehicle necessary to avoid receipt of any of the proceeds and allow you a limited extension of time to identify replacement property (within 45 days) and close the transaction (within 180 days). The time to complete the transaction cannot be extended and the IRS will not save a 1031 exchange transaction if the intermediary goes bankrupt. The capital gain on the property will be taxed if the bankrupt intermediary does not transfer the replacement property to the seller within the 180-day time period. The seller will be able to claim a loss deduction due to the intermediary’s bankruptcy. The loss deduction cannot be claimed, however, until the bankruptcy case is closed, which results in the seller likely paying the capital gains tax in a year before the write-off is available.

Unintended and simple, honest mistakes have significant adverse consequences. Wright Penning & Beamer has worked closely with reputable, qualified intermediaries. We will help you put the right team together that understands 1031 exchange transactions and follows the rules of the IRS Code. This allows you to receive the capital gains benefits that a properly-structured 1031 exchange transaction is meant to deliver.

Heather Brenneman Miles

BEWARE OF UNFAIR PAY PRACTICES

Lilly Ledbetter became a national celebrity when Congress passed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 in January of this year. Ledbetter had sued her employer, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, after learning that she had been paid less than her male co-workers for a number of years. Initially, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the statute of limitations had run and that Ledbetter could not pursue her claim. With considerable speed and fairly broad bipartisan support, Congress responded with the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, making clear its intention to discourage discriminatory pay practices. Under the Act, every paycheck that is issued revives or continues the unfair pay practice. As a result, disparities that were first put in place many years ago can still provide the basis for a claim against the employer.

Given the national attention the new administration and the media have drawn to this particular legislation, employers may expect that both employees and regulatory agencies will have a renewed interest in investigating and pursuing claims based on unequal pay practices. For this reason, companies should conduct a rigorous audit of their own payrolls. In particular, companies need to question and challenge disparities in pay among employees in similar positions to ensure that there is a logical, non-discriminatory reason for that disparity. If your organization has not conducted such an audit, or does not know how to do so, contact the attorneys at Wright Penning & Beamer for assistance.

Dirk A. Beamer
———————————————