Surefire Way to Avoid Civil Cause of Action for Damages

Minors, alcohol and underage drinking
Minors, alcohol and underage drinkingAs we approach the season of high-school proms, graduations and graduation open houses and parties, it is important to remember the basics concerning alcohol, minors and underage drinking. What may seem like a harmless or innocent circumstance in providing a minor with an alcoholic beverage can result in negative consequences lasting a lifetime to both the adult and the minor child.

Zero tolerance by police officers
Minors in Possession Zero Tolerance by Police OfficersThe laws are simple. First, it is against the law for a person under the age of 21 to consume any alcoholic beverage or have any bodily alcohol content period. If a minor child is determined to have consumed an alcoholic beverage or have any bodily alcohol content, they can be charged with a misdemeanor leading to fines, court-ordered substance abuse counseling, and in the case of multiple violations or offenses, up to 90 days in jail. You may have heard that many police agencies have made enforcement of the “minor in possession laws” (”MIP”) a top priority. There is typically a zero tolerance by police officers who have reason to believe a minor has consumed or is in possession of alcohol.

Civil cause of action for damages
Next, it is against the law to sell or furnish alcohol to a minor. What some individuals don’t realize is that someone who furnishes alcohol to a minor, who is then involved in an accident causing bodily injury or death to another individual, is guilty of a felony punishable with imprisonment of up to 10 years. Finally, in addition to criminal penalties, Michigan law provides the ability for an individual who is injured by a person under 21 years of age who is under the influence of alcohol in an automobile accident or any other occurrence to pursue a civil cause of action for damages against a “social host” who provided the alcohol to that individual. It is also important to note that several homeowner insurance policies have, over the past few years, become much more stringent in excluding such occurrences from insurance coverage in the event a civil cause of action is filed and pursued against a social host who provided alcohol to a person under the age of 21.

Think twice before you pour
Think twice before you pour a minor a drinkThe rules are simple. The consequences are clear. Underage individuals who drink alcohol, and the persons who provide them with the alcohol, will face severe consequences. It is important to keep these important facts in mind when planning your upcoming graduation celebrations.

Dan A. Penning

Stealing the Help and Kissing Your Sister

Paying your competitor’s attorney fees in Non-Compete Cases

Non compete agreementsAfter seventeen years practicing law, I find that most business clients appreciate the services I have to offer and are willing to pay a fair fee for them. But I have yet to meet a client who feels at all inclined to pay the legal bill of a competitor who has just sued. That’s like being thirteen and kissing your sister. Yet when corporations sue each other over the alleged theft of a valuable employee, the dispute can quickly become a fight over attorney fees.

Any time you hire a competitor’s current or former employee (or independent contractor), you face the risk of a lawsuit from the competitor alleging improper interference with a contract, or some other form of unfair competition. If the employee had a written agreement not to compete with the former employer, the risk of such a suit is all the greater. Risk assessment needs to be part of the hiring decision so you can decide whether the potential employee’s attributes justify the risk. In performing that assessment, you have to consider the possibility of paying not only damages but also the cost of your own – and even your competitor’s – legal fees.

Judge's injunction to stop alleged unfair competitionIf the competitor goes to the trouble of suing you, it will probably bring every plausible claim available against you. In non-compete cases, this usually involves a claim that the employee and you have conspired to steal the competitor’s trade secrets and proprietary information. In most lawsuits between business competitors, each side pays its own legal expenses – win, lose or draw. But under Michigan’s version of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, a prevailing plaintiff can recover attorney fees if it shows that the defendant willfully and maliciously stole a trade secret.

Just as I have never met a client anxious to pay a competitor’s lawyer, I have also never met a client (whether a corporation or an individual business person) who believes he acted maliciously in his business dealings. Unfortunately, there is scant case law in Michigan clearly defining willful and malicious conduct under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. As a result, in virtually every non-compete case brought naming you as a defendant, you will face the argument – and the risk – that you did act maliciously.

Most non-compete cases start with a request for an immediate injunction to stop the alleged unfair competition. This requires the judge to conduct a hearing that resembles a mini-trial at the outset of the lawsuit. The judge’s decision whether or not to grant the injunction will be widely viewed as a barometer of the ultimate merits of the case. Consequently, many cases settle once the judge grants or denies the injunction requested, if not before. In the mean time, the parties – and the suing party in particular – will have incurred substantial legal bills in a short amount of time. (In one case I defended, the opponent racked up about sixty thousand dollars in fees in the one month between filing and settling the case.) With the judge’s decision on the injunction having effectively resolved the merits of the claim, the parties are left to fight over who should foot the bill for having brought the matter to court.

Minimize risk of paying competitor's attorney feesObviously, the judge’s decision on the injunction will either strengthen or weaken the suing party’s claim that you acted maliciously. Either way, both sides will need to consider carefully how much more legal expense they are willing to incur solely to fight over who should pay the fees to date. If the case appears ready for settlement even before the judge rules on the request for an injunction, you still may face a fight over attorney fees. I have seen plaintiffs with no real damages become all the more insistent that they recover attorney fees as a matter of principle to ensure that the perceived misconduct does not go unpunished. If you are defending, do you buckle and pay some portion of the other side’s fees, or do you hold ground as a matter of principle? If you hold fast, you may end up paying far more money in the long run, albeit to your own attorney rather than to your competitor’s. As a colleague once told me, “It is perfectly appropriate to stand on principle, once you have acknowledged that principle is expensive.”

How do you avoid the distasteful dilemma of paying some portion of a competitor’s attorney fees? While no answer is full proof, there are steps you can take to minimize the risk:

  1. Fully assess the risk going in. When interviewing potential employees, have them confirm in writing as part of the interview process whether they have obligations under an existing non-compete agreement. If they answer “no,” it will be harder for a competitor to show you acted willfully and maliciously in the hiring process. If the answer is “yes,” then you know you face a greater threat of a lawsuit and, consequently, may not want to hire the individual. (One caveat: if you do hire the individual notwithstanding his written admission of an existing non-compete, you may strengthen the argument that you have acted with malicious motives.)
  2. Avoid trade secrets. If you do hire a competitor’s current or former employee, be extremely vigilant in instructing the new employee and all who work with him that you will not condone any using or sharing of the competitor’s proprietary information and trade secrets. Monitor the situation for compliance. This will make it harder for your competitor to seek fees under the Uniform Fair Trade Practices Act.
  3. Assess your risks again. If you do find yourself in a lawsuit, make sure your initial assessment of your potential liability includes a proper allowance for attorney fees. It rarely makes sense to hold fast to an unreasonably low settlement position, only to spend far more in defense than what you could have resolved the case for early on.

By their nature, non-compete cases force the parties to spend considerable legal fees early in the process, often before either side has a solid understanding of the damages suffered. Many times, the actual damages a suing competitor is able to prove will be far smaller than the fees incurred. Given the attorney fee award provisions under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, you could find yourself fighting to avoid a fee award against you, even in a case where you have caused no measurable harm to your competitor. Try your best to understand your risks before making the hire. That doesn’t mean you won’t make the hire if the employee is worth the risk. After all, most thirteen year olds would kiss their sister — for the right price.

Dirk A. Beamer

Subsidy for COBRA Premiums Extended

“Here is a timely reminder about COBRA benefits from our friend Kirk Radford at Taligence – HR Consulting & Solutions:”

President Obama and Congress have once again extended the COBRA subsidy. Approved yesterday, the Continuing Extension Act of 2010 provides a 65% subsidy of COBRA premiums for individuals who lose group health plan coverage because of an involuntary termination between March 1 and May 31, 2010. The subsidy is available for up to 15 months.

The extension also applies to those who initially lost group health plan coverage because of a reduction in hours and then experienced a termination of employment between March 1 and May 31 of this year.

NOTICES MAY BE REQUIRED
Because the last COBRA subsidy extension already expired, individuals who experienced an involuntary termination since March 31, 2010 and have already received a COBRA election notice will need to receive an updated notice explaining their rights under the extension. These individuals are entitled to a special election period, even if they previously declined COBRA coverage. The updated notices must be sent by June 15, 2010.

We expect the Department of Labor to issue additional guidance and an updated election form(s) soon.

Kirk P. Radford
Taligence - HR Consulting & Solutions
www.taligence-hr.com

Dan A. Penning

Protection While Navigating The Great Lakes and Michigan Inland Lakes

Launching a boat in April in MichiganLaunching a boat in Michigan waters during the month of April is not very common. Boat insurance policies, however, generally begin to provide coverage on April 15. If you’ve not given much thought to your boat insurance policy, this spring might be a good time to review your policy and determine if you need more protection as you navigate the Great Lakes or Michigan’s inland lakes.

Although many homeowner and automobile companies offer boat insurance, the coverage your existing policy provides may not be adequate. Many policies provide a list of “named perils” outlining situations the policy covers, such as fire, vandalism and malicious mischief. If you need more coverage, look for an “all risks” policy that covers more predicaments in which you might find yourself.

Safe  boating at the family cottage on Michigan LakesThe valuation clause in the policy is what determines the calculation the insurance company uses to arrive at the amount to pay in the event of a loss. Actual cash value policies take into account depreciation, where other policies are written on the basis of “agreed value.” If the boat is a total loss, the policy holder of an “agreed value” policy receives the amount as provided in the policy, rather than the actual cash value. This coverage is not available from every insurance company.

Do you travel throughout the state, towing your boat to various lakes? Review your policy for any navigation limits. Some policies are only effective within 100 miles of your home.

Towing, salvage, and wreck removal are other important considerations and they are defined differently. Some policies cover only towage, which is usually determined by the state of the vessel. Distinguishing between whether a distressed boat is in a tow situation or a salvage situation is often difficult. If the situation was not reported timely or weather conditions worsened over time, these can affect whether your policy will cover your situation. Some broader policies cover salvage and wreck removal up to the full amount, but most insurers limit this coverage and some omit it all together.

Boating fun on Michigan LakesConsider liability and bodily injury coverage that provides you with liability insurance coverage when there is damage to something owned by someone else or injury to someone else. Medical payments coverage pays for bills that may arise from an accident on a boat. Additional coverages may be available: uninsured boater’s insurance, roadside assistance (when towing your boat), trailer insurance, and coverage if you travel to Canada.

Boat insurance policies are available from many insurance companies; however, a real maritime insurance policy will likely offer you the best protection.

Dan A. Penning

What Protects Waterfront Landowners from Personal Injury Lawsuits

Provisions Protecting Landowners from Personal Injury LawsuitsAs weather in Michigan becomes warmer signaling the approach of summer, waterfront property owners begin thinking about boats, docks, jet skis, etc. Every summer, unfortunate accidents occur that are related to water and recreational activities: swimmers make a wrong judgment regarding the depth of the water and dive into shallow water resulting in severe neck injuries, boaters and those driving personal watercraft can be blinded by the sun and fail to see someone skiing or tubing behind a boat resulting in a catastrophic accident, a “slip and fall” during a game of volleyball played on the beach or in shallow water can cause unexpected and long-lasting injuries.

In 1987 the Michigan Supreme Court consolidated two cases, one involving an individual who was injured while slipping on logs that property owners installed at the edge of a lake to prevent erosion. The resulting neck injury caused paralysis from the shoulders down. Three neighborhood associations and individual subdivision lot owners were sued for damages. The defendants included over 200 individuals. The other case involved a child who drowned while she and her mother were visiting relatives. The child died in the shallow part of a pond owned by her aunt and uncle. The Supreme Court determined that the cases could proceed to trial despite the protections afforded property owners in the Michigan Recreational Land Use Act (RUA). The Court determined that the RUA was only applicable to large, undeveloped tracts of land.

Summer DockThe RUA, Michigan Compiled Law 324.73301(1) states: “[A] cause of action shall not arise for injuries to a person who is on the land of another without paying the owner . . . for the purpose of fishing, hunting, trapping, camping, hiking, sightseeing, motorcycling, snowmobiling, or any other outdoor recreational use . . . unless the injuries were caused by gross negligence [i.e., intentional misconduct] or willful and wanton misconduct of the owner.” In 2004, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed itself and determined that the RUA will, in fact, operate pursuant to its plain language. Therefore, unless a property owner acts with the intent to harm another, the RUA can protect a property owner from liability for injuries sustained by a third party who is performing recreational activities on the land irrespective of whether the land is undeveloped, developed, vacant, occupied, urban, suburban, rural, subdivided or unsubdivided.

The 2004 case involved a passenger on an ATV who injured her back after being bounced off the ATV as a result of the driver driving over an uneven area of the lawn. The Court determined that the RUA is limited in application to certain activities, i.e. outdoor recreational activities, but it is not limited in application to particular types of land. “Therefore, an owner is not liable to a nonpaying outdoor recreational user of his land, unless the user’s injuries are caused by the owner’s gross negligence or willful and wanton misconduct.” Neal v. Wilkes, 470 Mich 661, 670; 658 N.W.2d 648, 653 (Jul 20 2004). Thus, pursuant to the RUA, a landowner cannot be held liable for injuries suffered by a person while using the landowner’s land for an outdoor recreational activity, provided that

  • (1) the person has not paid the landowner to use the land, and
  • (2) that the injuries were not caused by the landowner’s gross negligence or willful and wanton misconduct.

Although property owners may breathe a little easier, the RUA does not protect a property owner from a lawsuit. It does, however, provide the property owner a defense if the facts of the case satisfy the provisions of the statute.

Dan A. Penning

Challenging Uncapping of Property Taxes

Uncapping Property Taxes The Michigan General Property Tax Act (the Act) requires real property in Michigan be assessed yearly and taxed at one-half (1/2) of its true cash value (true cash value is the same as market value). However, with the passage of the Headlee Amendment to the Michigan Constitution in 1994, limitations were placed on how much assessments and taxes could go up each year. Since 1994-1995, annual property tax increases have been “capped” at levels specified in the Act and remain capped until a “transfer of ownership” occurs. Once a transfer of ownership occurs, the property is reassessed at one-half (1/2) of the “true cash value” as of that date and the taxes, in most cases, go up substantially. The property tax is capped at the new, higher amount until the next transfer of ownership takes place (Michigan property tax bills show a “Taxable Value” and a “State Equalized Value.” The Taxable Value is the capped value upon which the property tax is assessed. The State Equalized Value approximates one-half (1/2) of the true cash value/market value of the property. Once the property tax is uncapped, the State Equalized Value and the Taxable Value become the same for the year in which the uncapping occurred and the cap goes back into effect at that amount).

The key term in all of this is “transfer of ownership,” which basically means a conveyance of title to, or a present interest in, real property. However, not all conveyances constitute a transfer of ownership. One such exclusion is for a transfer of ownership between two or more persons that creates or terminates a joint tenancy if

  1. at least one of the persons was an original owner of the property before the joint tenancy was initially created, and,
  2. if the property is held as a joint tenancy at the time of the conveyance, at least one of the persons was a joint tenant when the joint tenancy was initially created and that person has remained a joint tenant since that time.

In 1959, James and Dona Klooster, as husband and wife, acquired title to property in Charlevoix. They held the property as “tenants by the entirety” which is a form of joint ownership in Michigan applicable only to married couples. Dona then conveyed her interest to her husband James, who in turn as sole owner, conveyed the property to himself and his son Nathan as joint tenants with rights of survivorship. James died in January, 2005 which automatically made Nathan the sole owner. On September 10, 2005, Nathan conveyed the property to himself and his brother as joint tenants with rights of survivorship (”joint tenants with rights of survivorship” simply means that upon the death of one of the joint owners, the remaining joint owner(s) are automatically deemed to own the property as a matter of law; there is no new deed or new conveyance).

Uncapping Property TaxesIn 2006, the assessor for the City of Charlevoix determined that the death of James in 2005 constituted a conveyance to Nathan and uncapped the property taxes, resulting in a new taxable value that was almost double the previous taxable value. Nathan appealed the assessor’s determination to the local board of review which upheld the decision of the assessor. Nathan appealed that decision to the Michigan Tax Tribunal which upheld the decision of the board of review. Nathan appealed that decision to the Michigan Court of Appeals.

In an opinion rendered on December 15, 2009, the Michigan Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the Michigan Tax Tribunal, finding that the transfer that occurred as a result of the death of James (making Nathan the sole owner) did not constitute a transfer of ownership under the Act. As a result, the taxes should not have been uncapped. The court came to this conclusion based upon the wording of the Act which requires a “conveyance.” Because the Act does not define “conveyance,” the court, considering both legal and dictionary definitions, determined that a “conveyance” is an instrument in writing affecting title to real property. The court ruled that the death of James, which automatically vested sole ownership in Nathan as the surviving joint tenant, was not a conveyance. The assessor has appealed that decision to the Michigan Supreme Court which, just a few weeks ago, agreed to take the case.

So, why is this case important? Plummeting property values equate to lower property taxes and lower tax revenues. If taxable values can be uncapped, revenues will increase. This case, which focused solely on whether or not the death of a joint owner constitutes a transfer of ownership such as to allow for the uncapping of property taxes, is therefore of substantial importance to property owners and assessors alike. A decision is expected later this year.

Dan A. Penning

Reflection

Normally, our weekly emails provide information on various legal issues to assist our clients, contacts and other subscribers in their personal and business affairs. Today’s “special edition” is somewhat different. Hopefully the following information will make you pause, reflect on life a moment and simply make your day a little brighter. My wife and I have been blessed with three great sons, one of whom is challenged with autism. While not all of us have the challenge of raising a child with special needs, we all experience disappointments and failed expectations in our lives, careers and relationships. While the following poem focuses on the experience of raising the child with a disability, there are many lessons that we can all learn from the message of the author.

Airplane in flightWelcome to Holland

by Emily Perl Kingsley

I am often asked to describe the experience of raising a child with a disability - to try to help people who have not shared that unique experience to understand it, to imagine how it would feel. It’s like this…

When you’re going to have a baby, it’s like planning a fabulous vacation trip - to Italy. You buy a bunch of guide books and make your wonderful plans. The Coliseum. The Michelangelo David. The gondolas in Venice. You may l earn some handy phrases in Italian. It’s all very exciting.

After months of eager anticipation, the day finally arrives. You pack your bags and off you go. Several hours later, the plane lands. The stewardess comes in and says, “Welcome to Holland.”

“Holland?!?” you say. “What do you mean Holland?? I signed up for Italy! I’m supposed to be in Italy. All my life I’ve dreamed of going to Italy.”

But there’s been a change in the flight plan. They’ve landed in Holland and there you must stay.

The important thing is that they haven’t taken you to a horrible, disgusting, filthy place, full of pestilence, famine and disease. It’s just a different place.

So you must go out and buy new guide books. And you must learn a whole new language. And you will meet a whole new group of people you would never have met.

You have landed in HollandIt’s just a different place. It’s slower-paced than Italy, less flashy than Italy. But after you’ve been there for a while and you catch your breath, you look around…. and you begin to notice that Holland has windmills…. and Holland has tulips. Holland even has Rembrandts.

But everyone you know is busy coming and going from Italy… and they’re all bragging about what a wonderful time they had there. And for the rest of your life, you will say “Yes, that’s where I was supposed to go. That’s what I had planned.”

And the pain of that will never, ever, ever, ever go away… because the loss of that dream is a very very significant loss. But… if you spend your life mourning the fact that you didn’t get to Italy, you may never be free to enjoy the very special, the very lovely things… about Holland.

Have a great day,

Dan Penning

“Reinvented” Benefits

Reinvented Benefit Help for a Slow EconomyOver the last several years, Michigan has experienced extraordinary job loss. One fruit of those job losses has been an unusual number of business start-ups. All over the state, laid off workers have “reinvented” themselves, sometimes going back to school to pursue a different or more advanced degree, and sometimes going into business for themselves doing either the kind of work they have always done or something entirely new.

Online Resources
The federal government continues to develop online resources for the benefit of business owners. Among the recent resources posted by the Internal Revenue Service is a virtual small-business tax workshop that you can access at http://www.tax.gov/virtualworkshop. The virtual workshop consists of a series of nine videos covering a number of topics of interest to small business owners, particularly those who are just getting started. Lessons cover topics such as how to set up and run your business, how to file and pay your taxes using your computer, how to set up a home office or a retirement plan and how to manage payroll.

Taking Advantage of SBA Loan Programs
The U.S. Small Business Administration also has a number of online resources for small business owners. Several videos and podcasts can be accessed at http://www.sba.gov/training. Among the topics covered by the SBA are how to develop a business plan, how to survive in a down economy, and how to take advantage of SBA loan programs and federal government contracting opportunities.

The Need for Tax or Legal Counsel
These online tools don’t replace the need for tax or legal counsel, but they can help you make better and more efficient use of both your time and our office, which in turn can save you money. If you are considering a new business venture or you need our assistance with a legal matter affecting your ongoing business, please contact any of the attorneys at Wright Penning & Beamer. We would be pleased to help you!

Dan A. Penning

Collecting Interest on Past Due Balances

Customers signing invoices to collect interest on past due balancesUnpaid receivables cost your business money. Late paying customers may force you to resort to your business’ line of credit in order to satisfy your own cash flow obligations. You are, of course, paying interest on that line of credit.

If you expect to recoup interest from your customer, you need to make sure that an agreed, commercially reasonable interest rate is included as part of your purchase order, contract, or some written document that has been signed by the customer. If your customers are consumers as opposed to business entities, you have to make sure that the interest rate does not exceed the maximum permitted by the controlling state’s usury laws.

Absent a written agreement calling for interest, you will have difficulty recovering interest on the unpaid balance for any point in time prior to filing a lawsuit to collect the unpaid balance. In Michigan, if you do file suit and ultimately obtain a judgment for the amount owed, you will be able to include in your judgment statutory interest calculated from the date you filed the lawsuit. If your claim is based on a contract or written document, the interest will be computed based on any specific amount agreed to in the contract. If no amount was set forth in the contract, interest will be computed at 13% per year, compounded annually.

collecting interest on past due balancesIf there is no written agreement underlying your company’s claim, interest on any judgment you obtain will be limited to a variable amount, calculated at six month intervals, at a rate equal to 1% plus the average interest rate paid on five year United States Treasury Notes. As of January 5, 2010, that amount equals 3.48%. Obviously, a written agreement allows you to recover a much higher rate of interest.

In order to protect your ability to recover interest on unpaid balances, you should make sure that sales or services are provided pursuant to a written contract and that the contract specifically provides for the imposition of interest at a specified rate on any past due balance.

Dan A. Penning

Update on Effect of Parental Waivers for Children

Wright Penning and Beamer Woodman v. Kera, LLC and Parental WaiversIn 2008, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that a child’s ability to sue for a personal injury is not impaired despite any pre-injury waivers signed by the child’s parent. The case of Woodman v. Kera, L.L.C., 280 Mich. App. 125 (2008), involved a 5-year-old boy who was injured at an indoor recreation facility. The boy’s father had signed a pre-injury waiver, purporting to hold the recreation facility harmless if any injuries occurred to the child. According to the Court, the waiver could not prevent the child from pursuing a lawsuit against the facility. This conclusion was based on the common law rule that a parent lacks authority to waive, release, or compromise his or her child’s claims merely by virtue of the parental-child relationship. A parent, absent a specific exception created by the Michigan Legislature, cannot authorize an act that is detrimental to the child.

This case, which has far-reaching effects on commercial recreation establishments, churches, and schools, is currently under review by the Michigan Supreme Court. Oral argument on the case was heard by the Supreme Court in October of 2009, and an opinion is expected sometime later this year. It is also possible for the State Legislature to enact an exception to the general rule cited in Woodman, either before or after a decision is reached.

In the meantime, Woodman remains the rule in Michigan, and therefore establishments are best served by acting prudently and maintaining adequate insurance. While it is not recommended to discontinue the use of pre-injury waivers, awareness of the limited protection afforded by the waivers is important. For more information about this matter, please contact us.